Its the set of rules that govern relations between States which let to the same sovereignty does not recognize any authority above them. This argument gives the legal rules that dominate these relationships, innovative recipe that distinguish them from the rules relating to domestic law. People affiliated with this law are subject to the authority take the law and impose respect, while the states are subjects of international law, issued together "after the agreement between them, the systems that reflect their common interest, and keep each and every one of them is free to estimate the extent of its obligation and conditions for its implementation . law the internal law of obedience and compliance, is dominated by people who can force them to respect the law, the path of force if necessary, by administrative authorities. As for international law, it is, by contrast, is a law of coordination of only recruiting the cooperation between countries. Since this States are not subject to any authority above them, the contact between them is according to the "management, and keep each one from the sovereign in estimating the extent of their rights. This implies that all States to meaning of the legal basis is one, and since they tend to retail their key to the sacred values , the peace becomes "is not guaranteed. Therefore, all supporters of peace may be attacked by law, the idea of sovereignty is the main obstacle to the superiority of international law to persons him, and they are states. This inference is based on the logic of a matter for debate, but sovereignty with regret the idea of historical , it is difficult to change the date range of logical arguments. and must be integrated into these arguments strongly make the events of the command that was normal "yesterday, it appears the next day is" trivial. " This development was initiated after the two world wars, which Othbtta extent of the damage that lead to sovereign-ties released unleashed. Following the conflict first emerged some international organizations, notably the League of Nations is still increasing in number since the end of World War II. Although it was not possible in practice, recognize the importance of this incident immediately, "it was conceded a great" in terms of principles. Moving on from the international phase purely based on the coordination of voluntary government policies, to the community organizer, we arrive at a system derived from a different concept, can Find the properties of internal law and give a picture of a group of devices has the right of the legislation and the trial and execution. We must replace the exercise of the functions of social scatter some kind of authorities' focus is different severity depending on "the degree of solidarity felt by the allied countries. And thus are not taken to monotheism, which in vain" Try the invaders imposed, but are also "unity based on the approval of the joint to create power superior to its authority. and international organizations did not reflect this scheme theoretical but from a distance because it derives its existence from the countries themselves. and these countries are keen to retain the largest share possible of the sovereignty and only parts easy of them to the organization that created out of circumstances. and whatever seemed to contribute to international organizations, modest in terms of unit world, it was in the events of extreme importance. Since the first civilizations that emerged in the Mediterranean basin, we see that appeal contradictory between the gentlemen and the Alliance. that the history of international relations is the date of the rotation between the communities-oriented organization, and between the countries that in the wars continue, without knowing any system only imposed by the gaseous stat
